Home Search
 

Search the Blog

 

 

Browse Blog Category

 
 

Twitter


 

Tell Your Story

Share your experience with campaign finance and First Amendment regulation. Enter your e-mail below.

 

 

Blog Roll

Ballot Access News

Citizens in Charge

Electionline.org

Election Law Blog

Election Law @ Moritz

Election Law Center

Express Advocacy

First Amendment Center

HoltzmanVogel blog

Make No Law

National Journal's Under the Influence

Nonprofit & Foundation Advocacy Blog

Pay to Play Law Blog

Political Activity Law

Public Affairs Perspective

Public Participation Project

Save Our States

The Volokh Conspiracy

Votelaw

 
printPrint Page

BLOG

'Clean elections' makes top ten worst ideas list in Ariz.

Published on January 5, 2010 10:12 AM

Jeff Patch

Category: Taxpayer Financed Campaigns

dirtyt-shirtThe Phoenix New Times published its list of the "10 Worst Ideas of the Decade" over the holiday break, and — no surprise — Arizona's system of taxpayer handouts to political candidates makes the list:

8. Clean Elections. Okay, so voters approved this "reform" in the late 90s. But it's only in this decade that publicly funded elections have taken root here. And boy, have the results been lousy. Nearly $15 million in surcharges and court fees go into this fund every year -- and the best we have to show for it are a bunch of morons down at the Capitol. Sigh.

A lawsuit challenging the system is still pending in federal court, but a judge has preliminarily ruled that the "rescue funds" provision of the program is unconstitutional. The Center for Competitive Politics filed an amicus brief in the case, McComish v. Bennett.

 

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/trackback/clean-elections-makes-top-ten-worst-ideas-list-in-ariz

Login or Sign-Up to Comment

Bookmark and Share