Home Search
 

Search the Blog

 

 

Browse Blog Category

 
 

Twitter


 

Tell Your Story

Share your experience with campaign finance and First Amendment regulation. Enter your e-mail below.

 

 

Blog Roll

AFJ Nonprofit Advocacy Blog

Beltway Blogroll

Federal Anti-SLAPP Project

First Amendment Center

More Soft Money Hard Law (Bob Bauer)

MRC's Free Speech Alliance

Political Activity Law

Rick Hasen's Election Law Blog

Sabato's Crystal Ball

The Volokh Conspiracy

Votelaw

 
printPrint Page

BLOG

O'Connor: Joe the Merit Committee Board Member

Published on January 27, 2010

Jeff Patch

Category: Independent Speech, Jurisprudence & Litigation

A series of panel discussions at Georgetown University Law School Tuesday focused on the impact of the Supreme Court's recent rulings in Caperton and Citizens United on state courts.

smith-georgetownView the conference webcast here.

The conference, co-sponsored by The Aspen Institute, prominently featured Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is leading an initiative to abolish judicial elections in favor of judicial appointments.

The second panel, "Citizens United and the Election of State Court Judges," moderated by National Law Journal's Tony Mauro, featured a lively debate with CCP Chairman Bradley A. Smith, Jan Baran, Karl Sandstrom, H. Thomas Wells, Jr. and Fred Wertheimer.

While the Center for Competitive Politics is agnostic on the question of whether a system of appointments should be adopted instead of judicial elections, we're interested in engaging with groups like O'Connor's about any potential quantitative benefits of merit selection instead of focusing on conjecture about how money supposedly corrodes the judicial system. Under Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, the Supreme Court held that if states hold judicial elections, candidates must be afforded full First Amendment rights.

Arizona's commission, for example, has a majority-non-lawyer commission that holds public meetings to consider judicial nominees, who are then appointed by the governor — providing some political accountability. Switching over to merit selection should not remove accountability from the voters with qualification boards dominated by elite interest groups on either side of the legal community (such as the trial bar or business groups). Justice O'Connor enthusiastically agreed:

"You need Joe the Plumber!" O'Connor exclaimed at the afternoon question and answer session.

 

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.campaignfreedom.org/blog/trackback/oconnor-joe-the-merit-committee-board-member

Login or Sign-Up to Comment

Bookmark and Share